Epictetus: The Discourses
Book Three, Chapter 9 To a certain rhetorician who was going up to
Rome on a suit
When a certain person came to him, who was going up to
Rome on account of a suit which had regard to his rank, Epictetus inquired the
reason of his going to Rome, and the man then asked what he thought about the
matter. Epictetus replied: If you ask me what you will do in Rome, whether you
will succeed or fall, I have no rule about this. But if you ask me how you will
fare, I can tell you: if you have right opinions, you will fare well; if they
are false, you will fare ill. For to every man the cause of his acting is
opinion. For what is the reason why you desired to be elected governor of the
Cnossians? Your opinion. What is the reason that you are now going up to Rome?
Your opinion. And going in winter, and with danger and expense. "I must go."
What tells you this? Your opinion. Then if opinions are the causes of all
actions, and a man has bad opinions, such as the cause may be, such also is the
effect. Have we then all sound opinions, both you and your adversary? And how do
you differ? But have you sounder opinions than your adversary? Why? You think
so. And so does he think that his opinions are better; and so do madmen. This is
a bad criterion. But show to me that you have made some inquiry into your
opinions and have taken some pains about them. And as now you are sailing to
Rome in order to become governor of the Cnossians, and you are not content to
stay at home with the honors which you had, but you desire something greater and
more conspicuous, so when did you ever make a voyage for the purpose of
examining your own opinions, and casting them out, if you have any that are bad?
Whom have you approached for this purpose? What time have you fixed for it? What
age? Go over the times of your life by yourself, if you are ashamed of me. When
you were a boy, did you examine your own opinions? and did you not then, as you
do all things now, do as you did do? and when you were become a youth and
attended the rhetoricians, and yourself practiced rhetoric, what did you imagine
that you were deficient in? And when you were a young man and engaged in public
matters, and pleaded causes yourself, and were gaining reputation, who then
seemed your equal? And when would you have submitted to any man examining and
show that your opinions are bad? What, then, do you wish me to say to you? "Help
me in this matter." I have no theorem (rule) for this. Nor have you, if you came
to me for this purpose, come to me as a philosopher, but as to a seller of
vegetables or a shoemaker. "For what purpose then have philosophers theorems?"
For this purpose, that whatever may happen, our ruling faculty may be and
continue to be conformable to nature. Does this seem to you a small thing? "No;
but the greatest." What then? does it need only a short time? and is it possible
to seize it as you pass by? If you can, seize it.
Then you will say, "I met with Epictetus as I should meet
with a stone or a statue": for you saw me, and nothing more. But he meets with a
man as a man, who learns his opinions, and in his turn shows his own. Learn my
opinions: show me yours; and then say that you have visited me. Let us examine
one another: if I have any bad opinion, take it away; if you have any, show it.
This is the meaning of meeting with a philosopher. "Not so, but this is only a
passing visit, and while we are hiring the vessel, we can also see Epictetus.
Let us see what he says." Then you go away and say: "Epictetus was nothing: he
used solecisms and spoke in a barbarous way." For of what else do you come as
judges? "Well, but a man may say to me, "If I attend to such matters, I shall
have no land, as you have none; I shall have no silver cups as you have none,
nor fine beasts as you have none." In answer to this it is perhaps sufficient to
say: I have no need of such things: but if you possess many things you have need
of others: whether you choose or not, you are poorer than I am. "What then have
I need of?" Of that which you have not: of firmness, of a mind which is
conformable to nature, of being free from perturbation. Whether I have a patron
or not, what is that to me? but it is something to you. I am richer than you: I
am not anxious what Caesar will think of me: for this reason, I flatter no man.
This is what I possess instead of vessels of silver and gold. You have utensils
of gold; but your discourse, your opinions, your assents, your movements, your
desires are of earthen ware. But when I have these things conformable to nature,
why should I not employ my studies also upon reason? for I have leisure: my mind
is not distracted. What shall I do, since I have no distraction? What more
suitable to a man have I than this? When you have nothing to do, you are
disturbed, you go to the theatre or you wander about without a purpose. Why
should not the philosopher labour to improve his reason? You employ yourself
about crystal vessels: I employ myself about the syllogism named "The Living":
you about myrrhine vessels; I employ myself about the syllogism named "The
Denying." To you everything appears small that you possess: to me all that I
have appears great. Your desire is insatiable: mine is satisfied. To (children)
who put their hand into a narrow necked earthen vessel and bring out figs and
nuts, this happens; if they fill the hand, they cannot take it out, and then
they cry. Drop a few of them and you will draw things out. And do you part with
your desires: do not desire many things and you will have what you want.
Last reading: Chapter
8: How we must exercise ourselves against appearances Next reading:
Chapter
10: In what manner we ought to bear sickness
|