Epictetus: The Discourses
Book Three, Chapter 19 What is the condition of a common kind of man
and of a philosopher
The first difference between a common person and a
philosopher is this: the common person says, "Woe to me for my little child, for
my brother, for my father." The philosopher, if he shall ever be compelled to
say, "Woe to me," stops and says, "but for myself." For nothing which is
independent of the will can hinder or damage the will, and the will can only
hinder or damage itself. If, then, we ourselves incline in this direction, so
as, when we are unlucky, to blame ourselves and to remember that nothing else is
the cause of perturbation or loss of tranquillity except our own opinion, I
swear to you by all the gods that we have made progress. But in the present
state of affairs we have gone another way from the beginning. For example, while
we were still children, the nurse, if we ever stumbled through want of care, did
not chide us, but would beat the stone. But what did the stone do? Ought the
stone to have moved on account of your child's folly? Again, if we find nothing
to eat on coming out of the bath, the pedagogue never checks our appetite, but
he flogs the cook. Man, did we make you the pedagogue of the cook and not of the
child? Correct the child, improve him. In this way even when we are grown up we
are like children. For he who is unmusical is a child in music; he who is
without letters is a child in learning: he who is untaught, is a child in life.
Last reading: Chapter
18: That we ought not to be disturbed by any news Next reading:
Chapter
20: That we can derive advantage from all external things
|